Prescription
drugs are a vital part of health care plans, and it is important for
employers to understand the trends beyond prescription drug costs and
what they can do to manage those costs.
Spending
in the United States for prescription drugs was $234.1 billion in
2008, more than 6 times the $40.3 billion spent in 1990.1
Although prescription drug spending has been a relatively small
proportion of national health care spending, it has been one of the
fastest growing components compared to hospital and physician
services. However, due to various trends, the rate of increase in
drug spending has declined in recent years. By 2008, the annual rate
of increase in prescription spending was 3 percent, compared to 5
percent for hospital care and 5 percent for physician services
(Figure 1).
Annual
prescription spending growth slowed from 1999 (18 percent) to 2005 (6
percent) because of the increased use of generic drugs, the increase
in tiered copayment benefit plans, changes in the types of drugs used
and a decrease in the number of new drugs introduced.2
The annual change in drug spending
in 2006 (9 spending) increased as a result of a number of factors,
including the implementation of Medicare Part D. The 2007 change in
drug spending (5 percent) decelerated because of an increase in the
generic dispensing rate, slower growth in prescription drug prices
and growing consumer safety concerns about certain drugs.3
The 2008 drug spending change (3 percent) declined because of a
slight decline in per capita use of prescription drugs due to the
impact of the recession, a low number of new drug products and safety
and efficacy concerns.4
As
seen below in Figure 2, the share of prescription drug spending paid
by private health insurance increased substantially between 1990 and
2005 (from 26 to 48 percent), contributing to a decline in the share
that people paid out-of-pocket (from 56 to 24 percent); the public
funds (government) share of expenditures increased from 18 to 28
percent in that period. However, the implementation of the Medicare
Part D drug benefit in 2006 substantially changed the mix of funding
sources, as the government’s share rose from 28 to 37 percent
between 2005 and 2008, while the private insurance portion fell from
48 to 42 percent, and the consumer out-of-pocket share declined from
24 to 21 percent.
Notes
on Figure 2: “Consumer Out-of-Pocket” includes spending by
consumers for health care services not covered by a health plan and
cost-sharing amounts (coinsurance, copayments, deductibles) from
public and private health plans. It does not include consumer premium
payments and cost sharing paid by supplementary Medicare policies,
which are included in the Private Health Insurance category.
Medicare’s
and Medicaid’s shares of public funding changed when the Medicare
drug benefit took effect in 2006. Between 2005 and 2008, Medicare’s
share grew from 7 to 60 percent, and Medicaid’s share fell from 70
to 24 percent (Figure 3), because Medicare replaced Medicaid as the
primary source of drug coverage for beneficiaries with coverage under
both programs.
A number
of factors contribute to changes in prescription drug costs.
Increased Utilization. The number of prescriptions dispensed in the United States in 2009 increased 2.1 percent, a larger growth rate than the 1.0 percent increase in 2008 over 2007. From 1999 to 2009, the number of prescriptions increased 39 percent, compared to a U.S. population growth of 9 percent.5
Increased Utilization. The number of prescriptions dispensed in the United States in 2009 increased 2.1 percent, a larger growth rate than the 1.0 percent increase in 2008 over 2007. From 1999 to 2009, the number of prescriptions increased 39 percent, compared to a U.S. population growth of 9 percent.5
Lack
of Adherence. A recent
study found that the rate of unfilled prescriptions has increased.
Together, health plan denials and patient abandonment resulted in
14.4 percent of all new, commercial plan prescriptions going unfilled
in 2009, up 5.5 percent from 2008.6
A 2009 study found that drug-related morbidity, including poor
adherence (not taking medication as prescribed by doctors) and
suboptimal prescribing, drug administration and diagnosis, costs as
much as $289 billion annually, about 13 percent of total health care
expenditures.7
Price.
Prescription drug prices increased 3.4 percent in 2009, 2.5 percent
in 2008, 1.4 percent in 2007 and 4.3 percent in 2006. The average
annual growth in prescription drug prices from 2000 to 2009 was 3.6
percent, compared to 4.1 percent for all medical care and 2.5 percent
for all items.8
Changes
in Types of Drugs Used.
Prescription drug spending is affected when new drugs enter the
market and when existing medications lose patent protection. New
drugs can either increase or decrease overall drug spending,
depending on price and how the new drug relates to existing drugs on
the market (replaces something, is a new treatment, adds competition,
etc.). Drug spending is also typically reduced when brand name drugs
lose patent protection and face competition from new, cheaper generic
substitutes. FDA analysis of 1999-2004 data shows that for products
with a large number of generics, the average generic price falls to
20 percent and lower of the branded price.9
Several high-sales brand name drugs are expected to go off-patent in
the next five years. New competition from generic drugs may bring
down costs for patients.10
Sales
and Profitability.
Prescription drug sales were $300.3 billion in 2009, an increase of
5.1 percent over 2008. This increase was over double the 1.9 percent
increase from 2007 to 2008. IMS Health attributes the 2009 growth to
various factors including stronger demand, manufacturing pricing
practices, greater use of specialty drugs and fewer product safety
issues.11
IMS Health forecasts a 3 to 6 percent annual growth in the U.S.
pharmaceutical market in the next five years.12
PPACA
Changes Affecting the Pharmaceutical Industry.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, enacted March 23,
2010, includes several provisions that affect the pharmaceutical
industry:
- Imposes an annual fee on certain manufacturers and importers of brand name drugs whose branded sales exceed $5 million.
- Establishes a process for FDA licensure of biosimilar (i.e., interchangeable) versions of brand name drug; drugs are granted 12 years of exclusivity before biosimilar versions of a drug can be approved.
- Changes certain drug labeling requirements and requires the HHS Secretary to determine whether adding certain information to a prescription drug’s labeling and advertising would improve health care decision-making.
Response
A
variety of public and private strategies have been implemented to try
to contain rising prescription drug costs.13
Utilization
Management Strategies.
Health plans have responded to rising prescription drug costs by
increasing enrollee cost-sharing amounts, using formularies to
exclude certain drugs from coverage, applying quantity dispensing
limits, requiring prior authorization and using step therapy
(starting with the most cost-effective drug and progressing to more
costly therapy only if necessary). In 2009, over three-quarters of
workers with employer-sponsored coverage were in plans with three or
more tiers of cost sharing for prescription drugs, almost 3 times the
proportion in 2000 (27 percent).14
Figure 4 shows worker copayment amounts for three- and four-tier
structures.
*Fourth-tier
drug copay information was not obtained prior to 2004.
A 2009
survey of individually purchased health policies found that the vast
majority had drug benefits, with copayments being the predominant
form of cost sharing. All HMOs and the majority of PPO/POS policies
charged copayments which averaged, respectively, $10/$13 for generic
drugs, $26/$28 for preferred brand name drugs, and $44/$48 for
nonformulary drugs. Fewer than half of the PPO/POS policies had a
prescription drug deductible, while over half of the HMOs had a drug
deductible.15
Discounts
and Rebates. Private and
public drug programs negotiate with pharmaceutical manufacturers
(often using contracted organizations known as pharmacy benefit
managers) to receive discounts and rebates which are applied based on
volume, prompt payment and market share.
Medicaid.
Historically, prescription drugs have been one of the fastest-growing
Medicaid services. Medicaid spent $19.4 billion for prescription
drugs in 2008, an increase of 3.5 percent over 2007.16
Medicaid
requires drug manufacturers who want to sell their products to
Medicaid patients to agree to pay rebates to states for outpatient
drugs purchased on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries. PPACA increases
the Medicaid drug rebate percentages for several types of outpatient
drugs and requires that the resulting savings be remitted to the
federal government.
Medicare.
The Medicare Part D drug benefit shifted spending from the private
sector and Medicaid to Medicare, making Medicare the nation’s
largest public payer of prescription drugs (from 7 percent in 2005 to
60 percent in 2008). Medicare prescription drug spending as a share
of total U.S. prescription spending rose from 2 percent in 2005 to 22
percent in 2008. Medicare prescription drug spending totaled $52.1
billion in 2008, an increase of 13 percent over 2007.17
Purchasing
Pools. Some public and
private organizations have banded together to form prescription drug
purchasing pools which increase their purchasing power through higher
volume and shared expertise.18
Consumers.
Consumers are turning to a variety of methods to reduce their
prescription costs,19
including requesting cheaper drugs or generic drugs, using the
Internet and other sources to make price comparisons, using the
Internet to purchase drugs, buying at discount stores, buying
over-the-counter instead of prescribed drugs, buying drugs in bulk
and pill-splitting, using mail-order pharmacies20
and using pharmaceutical company or state drug assistance programs.
Importation.
The high cost of prescriptions has led some to suggest that
individuals be permitted to purchase prescription products from
distributors in Canada or other countries (it is currently illegal,
though it does still happen). Importation issues such as actual
savings amounts, drug safety, and marketplace competition and pricing
continue to be debated.
Outlook
HHS
projects U.S. prescription drug spending to increase from $234.1
billion in 2008 to $457.8 billion in 2019, almost doubling over the
11-year period. The average annual increase in drug spending from the
previous year is projected to increase from 3.2 percent in 2008 to
5.2 percent in 2009, and then rise to 7.3 percent in 2019 (reflecting
increases in drugs prices, the number of new drug approvals and the
share of expensive specialty drugs). Drug spending as a percent of
overall national health spending is projected to increase somewhat
from 10.0 percent in 2008 to 10.2 percent in 2019.21
In the
coming years, implementation of various provisions of PPACA will
affect prescription drug coverage, utilization, prices and
regulation.
- Coverage and utilization of prescription drugs will be expanded by PPACA’s:
- Health insurance mandate and premium and cost-sharing subsidies
- Designation of prescription drugs as an essential health benefit to be covered by private health plans through the new Health Benefit Exchanges and by Medicaid for newly eligible adults
- Medicare prescription drug rebate, cost-sharing and catastrophic threshold changes.
- Prices charged to government programs will be affected by changes to Medicaid rebate requirements and expansions to the Section 340B program.
- Prescription drug regulation will be affected by the new process for licensure of biosimilar versions of brand name biological products and by drug labeling requirements.
These
and other PPACA changes will ultimately impact national spending for
prescription drugs in ways yet to be seen.
Reprinted
with Permission from the Kaiser Family Foundation. The Henry J.
Kaiser Family Foundation is a non-profit, private operating
foundation dedicated to providing information and analysis on health
care issues to policymakers, the media, the health care community,
and the general public. The Foundation is not associated with Kaiser
Permanente or Kaiser Industries.
1
All spending amounts in this report are in current dollars (i.e., not
adjusted for inflation.)
2
Aaron Catlin et al., “National Health Spending In 2005: The
Slowdown Continues, “Health Affairs 26, no. 1 (January/February
2007)142-153.
3
Micah Hartman et al., “National Health Spending In 2007: Slower
Drug Spending Contributes To Lowest Rate Of Overall Growth Since
1998,” Health Affairs 28, no. 1 (January/February 2009) 246-261.
4
Micah Hartman et al., “Health Spending Growth At A Historic Low In
2008,” Health Affairs 29, no. 1 (January 2010)147-155.
5
Kaiser Family Foundation calculations using data from IMS Health,
www.imshealth.com
(Press Room, US Top-Line Industry Data 2008), and Census Bureau,
www.census.gov.
The per capita number may differ from the
number reported at KFF’s website www.statehealthfacts.org
because of differing data sources which use different retail pharmacy
definitions (e.g., IMS Health includes mail order, Verispan does
not).
6
Wolters Kluwer Pharma Solutions, Inc., Pharma Insight 2009: Patients
take More Power Over Prescription Decisions (March 2010),
www.wolterskluwerpharma.com/Press/Pharma%20Insight%202009%20-%20Media.pdf.
7
New England Healthcare Institute, Thinking Outside the Pillbox: A
System-wide Approach to Improving Patient Medication Adherence for
Chronic Disease (August 2009),
www.nehi.net/publications/44/thinking_outside_the_pillbox_a_systemwide_approach_to_improving_patient_medication_adherence_for_chronic_disease.
8
Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of Consumer Price Index, All Urban
Consumers, U.S. City Average, not seasonally adjusted,
www.bls.gov/cpi/home.htm,
accessed April 28, 2010.
9
US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, “Generic Competition and Drug Prices,”
www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDER/ucm129385.htm,
accessed March 12, 2010.
10
IMS Health, “IMS Forecasts Global Pharmaceutical Market Growth of
5-8% Annually Through 2014; Maintains Expectations of 4-6% Growth in
2010,” April 20, 2010, www.imshealth.com
(Press Room, Press Releases).
11
IMS Health, “IMS Health Reports U.S. Prescription Sales Grew 5.1
Percent in 2009, to $300.3 Billion” (April 1, 2010), online at
www.imshealth.com
(Press Room, Press Releases).
12
IMS Health Press Release, ibid., April 20, 2010.
13
See also Kaiser Family Foundation, Cost Containment Strategies For
Prescription Drugs: Assessing The Evidence In the Literature (March
2005),
14
Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust,
op. cit., Ex. 9.1,
http://ehbs.kff.org/?page=charts&id=2&sn=24&ch=1136.
15
America’s Health Insurance Plans, Center for Policy and Research,
Individual Health Insurance 2009: A Comprehensive Survey of Premiums,
Availability, and Benefits (October 2009),
www.ahipresearch.org/pdfs/2009IndividualMarketSurveyFinalReport.pdf.
16
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary,
National Health Statistics Group, at
www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/.
17
Ibid.
Version:1.0
StartHTML:0000000167
EndHTML:0000002719
StartFragment:0000000500
EndFragment:0000002703
18
National Conference of State Legislatures, “Pharmaceutical Bulk
Purchasing: Multi-state and Inter-agency Plans, 2008 edition”
(Updated May 8, 2008), www.ncsl.org/programs/health/bulkrx.htm.
19
Devon Herrick, National Center for Policy Analysis, Shopping for
Drugs: 2004, National Center for Policy Analysis, Policy Report No.
270 (October 2004), www.ncpa.org/pub/st/st270.
20
US mail services sales have increased 54 percent since 2003, though
their share of total US prescription sales has increased only
slightly -- 2007: $44.6 billion in sales, 16 percent of total
prescription sales; 2003: $28.9 billion in sales, 13 percent of total
prescription sales. IMS Health, www.imshealth.com
(About Us, Press Room, US Top-Line Industry Data, 2007 U.S).
21
Christopher J. Truffer et al. ”Health Spending Projections Through
2019: The Recession’s Impact Continues,” Health Affairs 29, no.3
(March 2010), 522-529.
If you are a business owner and have questions about what actions
you should take or what your responsibilities will be under the new law,
please don't hesitate to call Elizabeth Long, Senior Benefits
Consultant at 858-369-7923 or email her at elong@championrisk.net.
No comments:
Post a Comment